<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366</id><updated>2011-09-04T05:56:07.674-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Legitimate Content</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>17</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-109353025183472553</id><published>2004-08-26T10:17:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-08-26T10:24:11.836-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Curse of the Designer</title><content type='html'>I'm assuming that all of us decided to persue a profession in Industial Design because of our affinity for well made products. We some to school prepared to learn how to create the very thingas that we had once admired so much... where did it all go wrong? When did we become so critical that we can hardly enjoy the products avaiable to us. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think we all need to strive to not become designer elitists. I'm sure that all of us have been to a snobby art gallery and been turned off... so why recreate the bullshit? Perhaps our education should be emphasising precisely why we love the products we do, rather than critize the many that fall short. We also need to remember that we are (by far) not the best designers in the world, and that we still have a whole lot to learn. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I know that it sounds like I'm laying it on thick, but seriously- think about it. &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-109353025183472553?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/109353025183472553/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=109353025183472553' title='14 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109353025183472553'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109353025183472553'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/08/curse-of-designer.html' title='The Curse of the Designer'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>14</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-109345531529568135</id><published>2004-08-25T13:34:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-08-25T13:35:15.296-04:00</updated><title type='text'>The Music Animation Machine</title><content type='html'>Here's the developer's description of what it is:&lt;br /&gt;"The Music Animation Machine display is a score without any measures or clefs, in which information about the music's structure is conveyed with bars of color representing the notes. These bars scroll across the screen as the music plays. Their position on the screen tells you their pitch and their timing in relation to each other. Different colors denote different instruments or voices, thematic material, or &lt;a href="http://www.well.com/user/smalin/circle.html"&gt;tonality&lt;/a&gt;. And each note lights up at the exact moment it sounds, so you can't lose your place."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The&lt;a href="http://www.well.com/user/smalin/mamhist.htm"&gt; timeline&lt;/a&gt; can also help you to understand a little bit of how this thing works. Currently the only existing diplays of how this thing works is on video (it shows what the animation looks like with pre-determined songs). This can be a useful tool for music teachers and such, but it's just downright cool to look at (Jon... since you're a teacher you can get the video for free. It's $25 dollars for everybody else).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please please please do not look at the animation downloads for the Music Animation Machine. They are really poor quality, they are really jumpy and they will only ruin your impression of what the Music Animation Machine is before you even get a chance to see the real thing. Sorry, I know that was a little but abrupt, but I wanted to make sure that no one got the wrong idea about this... because it's really cool.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-109345531529568135?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/109345531529568135/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=109345531529568135' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109345531529568135'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109345531529568135'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/08/music-animation-machine.html' title='The Music Animation Machine'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-109324196659881952</id><published>2004-08-23T02:18:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-08-25T12:53:22.670-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Dan Brown on G-mail</title><content type='html'>Have you ever thought about the information architecture of emai? Most of our email services provide one method of organization: folders. Dan Brown, an information architect, is hardly good at organizing his traditional email (which is odd because he's an &lt;em&gt;information architect). &lt;/em&gt;He points out some the organizational advantages to google's new email service, G-mail, in his article &lt;a href="http://www.boxesandarrows.com/archives/the_information_architecture_of_email.php"&gt;The Information Architecture of Email&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Instead of asking the user to assign emails to a particular folder, gmail introduces a new method of email organization: threads. "By keeping all the messages together in a single thread, it’s easier to follow a conversation. More importantly, it doesn’t bog down the inbox with lots of messages with the same subject line." The threaded messages can be taken out of the inbox if you choose to archive it... ofcourse G-mail offers so much storage space (1 GB to be exact) that the archive acts as a trash can in some ways. Even if you are still not confident in locating your email thread, google has lent it's super fast search engine to their email service... allowing you to searck your own archive. Of course, all of this storage space does go against the concept of letting the bits go. But, if you're going to hold on to the bits- this isn't a bad way to go.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-109324196659881952?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/109324196659881952/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=109324196659881952' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109324196659881952'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109324196659881952'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/08/dan-brown-on-g-mail.html' title='Dan Brown on G-mail'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-109324163952396167</id><published>2004-08-23T02:13:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-08-25T13:12:36.246-04:00</updated><title type='text'>SmartDraw (or StupidDraw)</title><content type='html'>Create Great-Looking Flowcharts, Process Flow Models, and Concept Maps with SmartDraw—Download It Free! ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you'd like to see this online sales pitch for yourself go &lt;a href="http://www.smartdraw.com/specials/flowchart.asp?id=13105"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. "SmartDraw is so easy to use, you can download it and get started right away!" Hmmm... this sounds oddly similar to the dreaded doughnut graph on excel. All of a sudden you are picturing youself with this professional looking process flow or concept map... but what happened to the content? The boxes and diamonds are NOT what makes these visual representations difficult to make. They require tons of thought... in fact I would argue that a program that teaches you &lt;em&gt;how &lt;/em&gt;to do it and gives lots of stellar examples would be a lot more beneficial than a jazzed up paint program.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I know that the &lt;a href="http://www.smartdraw.com/resources/free/april.htm"&gt;April Fools Day clip art&lt;/a&gt; is really hard to pass up, you know... because, that really helps in making &lt;em&gt;great &lt;/em&gt;process flow. Now I know why Edward Tufte can be so elitist... because there's stuff like this out there. I haven't asked him personally, but I'm sure he would be ashamed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-109324163952396167?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/109324163952396167/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=109324163952396167' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109324163952396167'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109324163952396167'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/08/smartdraw-or-stupiddraw.html' title='SmartDraw (or StupidDraw)'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-109323866926261514</id><published>2004-08-23T00:54:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-08-23T01:24:29.263-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Thankyou, Andrew Mundi!</title><content type='html'>I'm sure that all of us &lt;em&gt;Industrial&lt;/em&gt; designers are feeling a little bit of graphic design pain right now. Well... Andrew Mundi is here to help us. The internet has very few good resources for graphic design tips (in my opionion). Most will tell you how to do specific tasks, but it's difficult to get graphic design advice. Jordan found a lovely website with a great &lt;a href="http://www.mundidesign.com/presentation/index2.html"&gt;flash presentation&lt;/a&gt; that contains a lot of this information.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you visit the site, the color theory and typography is a must see. I didn't previously know anything about typography, but now I can say I do. The sections on type anatomy and type families are very helpful. The way that Mundi explains these subjects is very "information architectury". When the mouse roles over certain words or images, call outs appear for more information.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I encourage my fellow classmates to check out the site (seeing as we are expected to understand and apply graphic design principles... but we haven't been taught how) Plus, we can all appriciate it from an info arch point of view. :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-109323866926261514?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/109323866926261514/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=109323866926261514' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109323866926261514'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109323866926261514'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/08/thankyou-andrew-mundi.html' title='Thankyou, Andrew Mundi!'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-109305506261562062</id><published>2004-08-20T22:04:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-08-20T22:24:22.616-04:00</updated><title type='text'>1000 Journals</title><content type='html'>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;"The &lt;a href="www.1000journals.com"&gt;1000 Journals Project&lt;/a&gt; is and ongoing, collaborative experiment attempting to follow 1000 journals throughout their travels. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;"The goal is to provide a method for interaction and shared creativity. If you ask a kindergarten class how many of them are artists, they'll all raise their hands. Ask the same question of 6th graders, and maybe one third will respond. Ask high school grads, and few will admit to it.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;"What happened to us growing up? We begin to fear criticism, and tend to keep our creativity to ourselves. Many people keep journals, of writing or sketching, but not many share them with people. (when was the last time a friend invited you to read their diary?) You will not be judged here. And you will have company. This is for you. For everyone. "&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;*****&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Pretty cool stuff, eh? I think that the reason that this idea is so compelling is because (brace yourself...) it involves an actual physical result. Of course, this idea isn't for everybody... if you're not creative you'd probably hate to be involved with 1000 journals. The point is, that the principle of this "movement" is like this living, breathing thing because of the nature of the interaction. In some ways this reminds me of the &lt;a href="www.wikipedia.com"&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt; in the sense that it depends on the good will of its users (something that is sadly missing from most products &amp; systems). The Wikipedia will be a total flop if people put bad material in, or even worse... don't put any information in at all. The 1000 journals project depends on the journals getting filled and getting returned. Starting the project was pretty simple; the creator of the project (who refers to himself as "Someguy") simply mailed out the journals to the first people on the list. But there was something much bigger that he did, which was the belief that people can do some pretty cool things if given the chance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The website has a bunch of scans of the journals (999 of which are still in circulation... yes, he's only gotten one back so far)... you guys should check them out!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-109305506261562062?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/109305506261562062/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=109305506261562062' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109305506261562062'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109305506261562062'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/08/1000-journals.html' title='1000 Journals'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-109281322381198777</id><published>2004-08-18T02:39:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-08-18T03:13:43.810-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Seemingly Unrelated Things...</title><content type='html'>I find it funny that throughout this entire "artificial companionship" project that the real hurdle is simply determining what you product is... It seems so simple, when you are asking youself over and over "What is it?" In class we touched on legacy, and how people are (sometimes very indirectly) affected by the idea that they will live on beyond their phycial life... (remember Judy burying her cats?)... We love the idea of our efforts producing real things; these things reflect who we are and have the ability to preserve it was well. I know we already went over all of this but just bear with me. In Donals Norman's book Emotional Design, he talks about how people tend not to get a great amount of satisfaction or pride out of doing things that are too easy. Norman conveys this point through a true story concerning the Betty Crocker Company in the early '50s. Most of us have made a cake from cake mix before... you take the mix, and water and an egg and bake. The interesting thing is, it wasn't always like that. It used to be even easier because it was just mix and water.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's an excerpt from the book:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;     ...The product failed, even though tast tests confirmed that people liked the result. Why? An after-fact-effort was made to find the reasons. As reseachers Bonnie Goebert and Herma Rosenthal put it: "The cake mix was a little too simple. The comsumer felt no sense of accomplishmentm no involvement with the product. It made her feel useless, especially if somewhere her aproned mom was still whipping up cakes from scratch."&lt;br /&gt;     Yes, it was too easy to make the cake. Betty Crocker solved the problem by requiring the cook to add an egg to the mix, thereby putting pride back into the activity. Clearly, adding an egg to a prepared cake mix is not at all equivilent to baking a cake "from scratch" by using individual ingredients. Nonetheless adding the egg gave the act of baking as sense of accomplishment, whereas just mixing water into the cake mix seemed too little, too artificial. Goebert and Rosenthal summarized the situation: "The real problem has nothing to do with the products intrinsic value, but instead represented the emotional connection that links the product to its user." Yes, it's all about emotion, pride, about the feeling of accomplishment, even in making a cake from prepared mix. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The principle that Norman mentions or pride and accomplishment (I believe) directly relates to the feeling of self worth that can sometimes dwindle in an older person. The interesting and valuable thing in this excerpt is the fact that sometimes it doesn't take a lot to feel a sense of accomplishement on a small scale.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-109281322381198777?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/109281322381198777/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=109281322381198777' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109281322381198777'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109281322381198777'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/08/seemingly-unrelated-things.html' title='Seemingly Unrelated Things...'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-109176550807246811</id><published>2004-08-05T23:53:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-08-06T00:11:48.073-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Jesse James Garrett</title><content type='html'>While Payaal and I were working on the 1040 tax project, one of our goals was to visually represent our process and our ideas. One of the main reasons that this suffered was because frankly we didn't spend enough time putting it together... but it's a skill that I think that we would all benefit from having both in the explanation of systems as well as representing our own ideas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While clicking around on the internet, I stumbled upon information regarding Jesse James Garrett, the man who developed the &lt;a href="http://www.jjg.net/ia/visvocab/#cluster"&gt;Visual Vocaulary&lt;/a&gt;. This looked strikingly similar to what we were learning in the Baseball Project, but his shapes are more fancy. The more interesting thing that I found was Garrett's &lt;a href="http://www.jjg.net/elements/elements_ch02.pdf"&gt;The Elements of the User Experience&lt;/a&gt;. You may not agree with the way that Garrett chucks the elements, but he presents his ideas well. He does a good job of repeating certain imagery by starting out simple and then adding that element into a more complicated idea later. Then again, it's not for me to decide... take a look and form your own opinion about it. :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-109176550807246811?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/109176550807246811/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=109176550807246811' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109176550807246811'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109176550807246811'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/08/jesse-james-garrett.html' title='Jesse James Garrett'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-109133130655585204</id><published>2004-07-31T23:16:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-07-31T23:38:51.206-04:00</updated><title type='text'>McDonald's gets hip...</title><content type='html'>Most of us have heard of IDEO (you know, the shopping cart movie). The design firm has taken on a project with McDonald's. IDEO and McDonald's have created &lt;a href="http://www.ideo.com/portfolio/re.asp?x=50175"&gt;self-order kiosks&lt;/a&gt; so that customers can order their meal without employee assistance. In case you were worried that the customers might not be able to speak English (or even illiterate) don't worry, the system is completely image based. Parents can now watch their children at the McDonald's Playplace while ordering their food... because the kiosks will be there as well as at the front counter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's interesting to think about the implications of this type of ordering system. Will McDonald's food be even cheaper now because they can have fewer employees? Will they put more of their money and effort into the quality of the food? Maybe the financial dynamics won't change but I think if this &lt;em&gt;trial&lt;/em&gt; proves to be successful, this would be one of the largest spanning examples of interface design we will see in the near future. McDonalds is one of the few brands that is recognized worldwide. Just imagine if these kiosks were in every McDonalds around the world... this is highly unlikely, but if they were successful I think that it would change the industry in a significant way.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-109133130655585204?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/109133130655585204/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=109133130655585204' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109133130655585204'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109133130655585204'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/07/mcdonalds-gets-hip.html' title='McDonald&apos;s gets hip...'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-109121373145513825</id><published>2004-07-30T14:27:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-07-30T14:55:31.456-04:00</updated><title type='text'>nathan.com</title><content type='html'>I can't take credit for finding nathan.com, Ashton showed it to me. Nathan is a guy that studies Interaction Design... and yes, that &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; include Information Architecture. While clicking around his website, I happened upon one of his projects: a re-design of the &lt;a href="http://www.nathan.com/projects/2002/images/nutritionlabel.pdf"&gt;Nutrition Facts Label&lt;/a&gt;. At the beginning of the quarter, we were talking about how misleading these labels can be, particularly with clever manipulation of the serving size. Nathan's re-design does include bolding of the serving size, but I'm not convinced that would &lt;em&gt;solve&lt;/em&gt; the problem, but it does help call attention to it. He also alphabetized the vitamins, which would make them easier to locate.  He has called out all the improvements that he has made on the webpage... but I have to say that I'm not too impressed. He did a good job of picking something that needed to be better, but in the end I think it's too similar to the old one. Nonetheless, it was a good start.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nathan has also posted a link to the &lt;a href="http://www.interaction-ivrea.it/en/about/theinstitute/index.asp"&gt;Interaction Design Institute Ivrea&lt;/a&gt;... the school is in ITALY (which is reason enough to go) and &lt;em&gt;by the way&lt;/em&gt; they offer a masters in Interaction Design. Pretty cool, eh? Thank you, Nathan.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-109121373145513825?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/109121373145513825/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=109121373145513825' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109121373145513825'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109121373145513825'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/07/nathancom.html' title='nathan.com'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-109038034828422800</id><published>2004-07-20T22:59:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-07-20T23:25:48.283-04:00</updated><title type='text'>InfoArchy Product!</title><content type='html'>I found an interesting article in this month's issue of Dwell... allow me to share it with you. A company called&amp;nbsp;Urban Mapping&amp;nbsp;created the Dynamap: Manhattan&amp;nbsp;in 2001. The map can show three levels of information on a single surface using &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;amp;q=define%3A+lenticular&amp;btnG=Google+Search"&gt;lenticular &lt;/a&gt;technology.&amp;nbsp;Most of us have seen this&amp;nbsp;technology used before in cheesy&amp;nbsp;children's products.&amp;nbsp;The article even says (and I quote) "While this isn't new technology, Urban Mapping applies it in a way that&amp;nbsp;would make visual explainer Edward Tufte proud". Before you read on, see the&lt;a href="http://www.urbanmapping.com/flashdemo.html"&gt; flash demo &lt;/a&gt;of the Dynamap. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the article, they mention the company is working on more of these maps for different cities. The cool thing is, they are not planning on treating each city the same. "In Washington D.C., it would be great to&amp;nbsp;include taxi zones on the same level as the metro, while for SanFrancisco we would include a topographical layer. I've even got a fog map" says Ian White, the creator of the Dynamap.&amp;nbsp;I think this kind of product&amp;nbsp;is great because it is rather lo-tech... yet it supplies the user with multiple layers of&amp;nbsp;information (quite literally). It's fun to think about all the different ways this&amp;nbsp;type of&amp;nbsp;display could be used. Ideas, anybody?&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-109038034828422800?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/109038034828422800/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=109038034828422800' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109038034828422800'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109038034828422800'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/07/infoarchy-product.html' title='InfoArchy Product!'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-109036392129658095</id><published>2004-07-20T18:24:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-07-20T18:52:01.296-04:00</updated><title type='text'>PowerPoint is Evil...(?)</title><content type='html'>Having spoken about Edward Tufte in class today, I find it appropriate to do some blogging on an article that he wrote: &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.09/ppt2.html"&gt;PowerPoint is Evil&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;(Jon sent me the link) Let me just&amp;nbsp;say that he &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; sound a little bit snobby in the article, but the man has a point. This was the part of the article that I found the most intriguing:&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Presentations largely stand or fall on the quality, relevance, and integrity of the content. If your numbers are boring, then you've got the wrong numbers. If your words or images are not on point, making them dance in color won't make them relevant. Audience boredom is usually a content failure, not a decoration failure.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;This passage speaks to what we discussed in class today. In my opinion, it's not that the program is actually evil, it's that is makes it so easy for people to make something that is not compelling at all seem important to some people. PowerPoint gives people easy access to tools that will give material &lt;em&gt;pizzazz&lt;/em&gt;... adding borders, shadows,&amp;nbsp;and clip art&amp;nbsp;doesn't help make the content interesting. Tufte suggests that if you think it helps then you're wrong. &lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;I wouldn't say that PowerPoint is evil, but I will say that it gives many people the opportunity to quickly produce complete crap and pull it off just because up on the screen. In some ways it's a little &lt;em&gt;too easy&lt;/em&gt; to make a shitty presentation. I don't think, however, that having people put the content on mat board would make much of a difference. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-109036392129658095?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/109036392129658095/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=109036392129658095' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109036392129658095'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109036392129658095'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/07/powerpoint-is-evil.html' title='PowerPoint is Evil...(?)'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-109017372068013010</id><published>2004-07-18T13:43:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-07-18T14:02:00.680-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Audio+Blog=Audblog</title><content type='html'>Last night I was listening to a song by Nina Gordon (ex-member of Veruca Salt), and for some reason I began to wonder what she looked like. I'm not a Nina Gordon fan, but I went to her website&lt;a href="http://www.ninagordon.com"&gt; &lt;/a&gt;anyway to find a picture of her to sate my curiosity. It was a cheesy looking website, but I clicked around for a while, and eventually I stumbled upon a section called &lt;a href="http://forum.ninagordon.com/ninasroom/ninasroom.html"&gt;Nina's Room&lt;/a&gt;. It's not uncommon for famous people to have online diaries for thier fans to read, but her diary was different. They were audio posts, made available by a service called &lt;a href="http://www.audblog.com"&gt;audblog&lt;/a&gt;. Even though I wasn't a fan of her's,&amp;nbsp; I still found myself listening to almost all of them... even the ones in the &lt;a href="http://www.ninagordon.com/ninasroom-archive.html"&gt;archive&lt;/a&gt;. I got to hear her complain about being bored because her boyfriend was playing video games, and ramble about how she loves Steak'n'Shake chocolate milkshakes before she went to sleep. I found this type of blog to be very intimate (certainly more intimate than traditional blogging). &lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Now you're wondering "Where is she going with this?&amp;nbsp; This has nothing to do with Information Architecture"... but really I think that it has a lot to do with it. Simply changing the format of the blog truely changed its impact on me as the viewer. The content was personal, and therefor the delivery was personal. The &lt;em&gt;point&lt;/em&gt; of Nina Gordon's diary was for regular people to feel like they could have a more direct connection with her, and it did exactly that. &lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-109017372068013010?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/109017372068013010/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=109017372068013010' title='5 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109017372068013010'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/109017372068013010'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/07/audioblogaudblog.html' title='Audio+Blog=Audblog'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>5</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-108995294554977957</id><published>2004-07-16T00:20:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-07-16T00:42:25.550-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Different Strokes</title><content type='html'>I think the critique today gave all of us some good food for thought concerning our boards. We briefly touched on the everyone's personal sytle coming through in our boards... even though we were all given the same constraints, the end results were vastly different. It's kind of neat to think that, despite all of our planning, that visual wieght can be given to certain aspects without us even noticing. At first I thought that something unintentional wasn't good, but now I think that it might be a really good thing. In class we were talking about data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. In order to create our final boards we had to have wisdom (or at the very least, knowledge) of baseball. While we were creating the final product, you carry that knowledge/ wisdom with you... and in a way it could be guiding one's inclination to make certain items stand out more. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-108995294554977957?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/108995294554977957/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=108995294554977957' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/108995294554977957'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/108995294554977957'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/07/different-strokes.html' title='Different Strokes'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-108890695164666252</id><published>2004-07-03T21:36:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-07-04T22:14:43.606-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Emotional Design in Information Architecture?</title><content type='html'>Right now I'm about half way through the book Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things by Donald Norman. From what I can gather, the book is a response to some negative feedback that he recieved from his earlier book The Design of Everyday Things. A compelling point that Norman makes is that beautiful and well made products actually do work better because it means that the person using the product is more likely to be happy. A happy user is more likely to be solution oriented and is generally more receptive... therefore, more likely to have success with the product. This, in turn, means that the product overall works better because of it's abilty to deliver more successful uses. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As I was going through the "Guide to the internet" in our reading in Information Anxiety, I was amazed at how such a complicated subject was explained in such a simple way (I know, obviously- that's the point)... but then I got to thinking. I *know* that understanding how the Internet works is complicated, yet the presentation of the material put me at ease, as if to say "Don't worry, I'm only telling you what you need to know in order to understand this." The feeling that came over me was not unlike what Norman decribes in Emotional Design. Helpful graphics, size and weight of font, and general organization became as emotional and therefore as helpful high quality materials used on a phyical product.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I guess what I am suggesting is... when information is displayed correctly, it can be somewhat empowering for the person that endeavors to understand it. Jon said in class that the more he learns about Information Architecture, the more that he thinks that it is really a study of linguistics. I think that point runs deeper that I can understand at this point, but I will say that words can be devisive, meaning... the words that people use to explain things can make you feel stupid or inferior. The emotional qualities of good Information Architecture might just be empowering to the point that it makes you feel more smart than you actually are. As a result, one might be able to understand information better by being more *confident* in their ability to understand. &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-108890695164666252?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/108890695164666252/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=108890695164666252' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/108890695164666252'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/108890695164666252'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/07/emotional-design-in-information.html' title='Emotional Design in Information Architecture?'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-108839193451828282</id><published>2004-06-27T22:51:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-06-27T23:05:34.520-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Edward Tufte</title><content type='html'>It's funny, I sat down to blog... and then I noticed that I didn't really know what I was going to blog about. I decided to look through on of the class handouts, and I stumbled upon the "Major Players in the Field". For whatever reason, I decided that Edward Tufte would be the major player that I would learn about. I went to his official site, and what I found was suprising. The tabs on the web site started off pretty standard looking... home, books, courses... later I found fine art and sculpture listed. I coudn't believe it... *prints* of this man's work were selling for $200 each. Japanese Weather Map and Music Score with Dance Notation were among the titles listed. It was becoming clear to me that this man is quite the celebrety. I looked through the colleection of books, and they sounded fascinating... then I saw a tab on the web page titled "courses" so I clicked on it. Turns out Mr. Tufte teaches classes (and they're half price for students). I'm really thinking about going. On top of having a chance to learn from such an icon, it'd be really nice to get out of town for something actually cool. &lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-108839193451828282?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/108839193451828282/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=108839193451828282' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/108839193451828282'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/108839193451828282'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/06/edward-tufte.html' title='Edward Tufte'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7397366.post-108805140704015037</id><published>2004-06-24T00:18:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2004-06-24T00:30:07.040-04:00</updated><title type='text'>I promise to be better this time...</title><content type='html'>Okay, so I was really bad about blogging last quarter, but this time I promise to be better about it. Plus, I have more time in general this time of year so I *really* have no excuse. Anyway, today we played baseball and I didn't suck as bad as I thought I would... I actually hit the ball each time I was up to bat. It was nice to refresh my memory on some of the basic rules (especially considering our current project). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I got really excited about the music video that we saw in class. Instead of doing the easy thing and asking Jon for the name of the artist and the song...  I did about a million google searches for ANY combination of the words: information, architecture, music, video, and MTV. The good news is... eventually I found it. If anyone wants it, it's called "Remind Me" and the name of the artist(s) is Royksopp &lt;--- and yes, that *is* the way it's spelled. The problem is, all of the links to it were dead, so I finally just had to download LimeWire and download it (possibly) legally. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm sure I'll have more "in depth" comments later in the quarter. I'm going to bed... good night!&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7397366-108805140704015037?l=legitimatecontent.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/feeds/108805140704015037/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7397366&amp;postID=108805140704015037' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/108805140704015037'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7397366/posts/default/108805140704015037'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://legitimatecontent.blogspot.com/2004/06/i-promise-to-be-better-this-time.html' title='I promise to be better this time...'/><author><name>Stefanie</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06173013171254507224</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
